Consciousness and Original Sin November 3, 2008
Posted by Visionary in Life, Perception, Philosphy, ethics, hope, morality.Tags: Adam and Eve, Albert Einstein, belief, ethics, Evil, God, Good and Evil, hope, Human nature, Life, morality, Nuremberg Principles, Original Sin, Perception, Philosphy, Religion and Spirituality
trackback
In Good and Evil, Choice and Responsibility I speculated that if an entity is not conscious, nothing that it does can be determined to be good or evil. There must be conscious and therefor active choice involved for an action to be labeled either good or evil. Once an entity attains conscious, everything it does is a choice for which responsibility must be taken. What we describe as evil only exists when conscious beings do not actively choose to manifest good.
Could it be that what we fear most is the burden that the responsibility of choice places upon us? The thought we might be alone in a cold, dark, infinite and lonely universe is the most terrifying thought imaginable. Could it be that we need God to blame? How many times do we hear ourselves asking how could God let something happen? Aren’t we a little like children frightened about leaving home and having to take care of ourselves for the first time – pushed from the garden of eden by our father?
There are proportionally very few evil individuals who wish to act against the natural order of things. The problem is not the number of people being evil, it is that the number of people who are not being good.
Why then do a large majority of human beings who consider themselves good not act in accordance with their beliefs about themselves as being good? Why do we tolerate evil and allow it to exist and flourish amongst us? Why do we not act to manifest good in our world?
Out of fear most of us attempt to escape our responsibility by choosing to do nothing. We look the other way and tell ourselves that if we are not committing evil, we are by default being good. However, if conscious choice is a prerequisite to good and evil, there can be no such thing as passive good. In order for an act to be good, we must take full responsibility for our ability to choose and consciously act to manifest good.
The world is not dangerous because of those who do harm but because of those who look at it without doing anything — Albert Einstein
We convince ourselves that since the difference we can make as individuals seems so small that our actions must make no difference at all. Our conclusion from this is that since we can’t change what’s happening in the world by ourselves, it can’t be our responsibility. So instead of acting to manifest good, we sit at home watching the world through our TVs condemning what we see happening but accepting no responsibility for it.
After the second world war, many German soldiers tried to use the fact that they were following orders as a legal defense for participating in or not opposing atrocities committed by the Nazis between 1939 and 1945. The International Law Court at Nuremberg refused this defense and made a ruling documented in the Nuremberg Principles that declares that individuals have a legal obligation to follow their moral code.
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him. — Nuremberg Principles, Principle IV
All human creations exist solely through a constant effort of will. No matter how large the creation or how long it has endured, once the will to create is gone, it takes very little time for the creation to return back to the entropy from which we created it. Modern scientists estimate it would take less than 1000 years for all traces of humanity to be erased from the planet if our species were to become extinct. Good too is a human creation manifest through an effort of will.
I could never understand the concept of Original Sin as taught by the church. It seemed absurd that an innocent child who had never even drawn breath could be tainted with sin. It didn’t help that no representative of the church that I questioned on the subject could tell me anything more on the subject than the doctrine taught in theology class.
Writing this series of articles about Good & Evil triggered a realisation. Could it be that the concept of Original SIn is an attempt to convey that there can be no such thing as passive good? Once we became conscious, we are required to remain vigilant and act consciously to manifest good, for if we fail to, we are condoning evil which must surely be a sin?

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=48b9b40c-7802-42ae-9dca-30adbfd7297e)
Wow V… you have hit a moment of clarity… a moment of wisdom… to hold and understand knowledge is the same as understanding “evil”
They both are abstract and hold much power… we must be vigilant because, you are right… once we understand it we are accepting it and we are allowing it… So we must, as part of consciousness, be prepared for it… we are responsible… so let us choose to do something… that begins with the acceptance of knowledge… great work again!!!
So true. To look the other way is in effect not good or evil. It is simply a neutral stance – but when evil is prevalent – it in itself manifests evil; same can be said of goodness. People in general need motivation in order to do anything. If we don’t love something – we will have no real motivation to embrace it. Thus, it essential to teach, preach, and show love to all we know and encounter in order to defeat that which we deem evil.
Great leaders awaken the consciousness of the masses of passive individuals – as those who are good are just as few as those who are evil. I find it remarkable that a man responsible for radical change in America knew this and died enlightening the consciousness of the passive masses. . .
History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
The hottest place in Hell is reserved for those who remain neutral in times of great moral conflict.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
There can be no deep disappointment where there is not deep love.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
You are absolutely correct in asserting that moral complacency is as much a sin as immoral activity.
Regarding the Original Sin, consider that the forbidden fruit was from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil; apparently, it was the realization that such things existed that ruined the human race and not the existence of evil (or good) itself. Consider that the first thing Adam and Eve did after their transgression was to look for something to cover their naked bodies with… something which was never a problem to them before. With that in mind, is sin a sin if you’re not aware it’s a “sin?”
Anyway, unlike opening Pandora’s box and releasing evil into the world, eating the fruit merely opened our eyes to the evil (and good) that was already there.
The Sin itself was less about disobedience and more about pride: the serpent told Eve that the reason God didn’t want her to eat of the fruit was that it would make her a god, too. Of course, Adam’s failure to stop her, but rather join in himself, was probably the greater sin. And in a sense, we (the human race) have been trying to become gods ever since.
God bless!
Very thought provoking post. I believe it was Edmund Burke who once stated that ..
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”
Thanks all for your comments.
@enreal – thank you for your encouraging words. Yes – let us choose!
@cordie – Thanks for your words and for the words of Dr King. I don’t know a lot about Martin Luther, it looks like I need to do some research.
@Robert – thanks as ever for your knowledgeable input on the biblical facts. If you take a look at the first part in this series referenced in the first line, you will see that I refer back to the moment Adam & Eve ate of the tree of knowledge and attained consciousness. Awareness changes everything.
@Fitch – I believe your right – thanks for pointing me in the direction of another insightful quote